Go
HomeASCP FoundationCCGPCalendarDiscussionContactStore
Join ASCP Earn CE Credit Develop Your Practice Explore Policy Issues Read All About It
About ASCP
Education & Meetings
Practice Resources
Government Affairs & Advocacy
Publications
Members
Students
Industry
Public
spacer
ASCP 40th Anniversary
spacer
ASCP on Twitter ASCP on Facebook ASCP on LinkedIn
spacer
AARP Doughnut Hole Calculator
Advanced SearchSite Map
Government Affairs & Advocacy Section
Government Affairs & Advocacy Section picture
spacer
spacer
Midyear Conference + Exhibition '10
spacer
Easy Prior Authorizations
spacer
QCCPP
spacer
Addressing Barriers to Optimal Care of Patients with MDD and GAD in the Long-Term Care Setting: The Pharmacy Perspective
spacer
Policies and Procedures: Pharmacy Services for Nursing Facilities
Government Affairs & Advocacy
ASCP Members - Are you reading ASCP Insider?
Read ASCP Insider to catch the latest exclusive updates on legislative developments, ASCP's advocacy work, and other issues affecting pharmacists!  Archives available here (members only).  All ASCP members are eligible to receive the weekly Insider e-newsletter free!   If you're not already receiving it, please e-mail us to request it!

Recent News (click here for archive of past news items)

March 1, 2010
GAO Report: Specialty-tier Eligible Drugs a Factor in Medicare Beneficiaries Reaching the "Catastrophic Coverage Threshold"
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) published on March 1 a report of its findings based on a request to research information regarding the high cost of drugs eligible for a specialty tier under Medicare Part D plans.  The report looks at Medicare Part D spending in 2007 and how different cost structures affect out-of-pocket expenses for beneficiaries.  It also looks at Part D plan sponsors' ability to negotiate price concessions and manage utilization. The study found that:
  • Specialty tier-eligible drugs accounted for 10 percent of total prescription drug spending under Medicare Part D plans in 2007.
  • Medicare beneficiaries who received a low-income subsidy accounted for 70 percent of that total.
  • Fifty-five percent of all Part D beneficiaries who used at least one specialty tier-eligible drug reached the catastrophic coverage threshold in 2007, whereas only 8 percent of all Part D beneficiaries who did not use a specialty tier-drug reached the catastrophic threshold.
  • Plan sponsors have very little leverage with drug manufacturers when negotiating prices for specialty tier-eligible drugs unless the drug has multiple competitors on the market.
  • Plan sponsors claim that the inability to leverage pricing for specialty tier-eligible drugs is the result of CMS' restrictions for excluding competing drugs from plan sponsors' formularies.  Specialty tier drug costs have risen dramatically over the past three years.
  • Plan sponsors tend to require prior authorization for specialty tier-eligible drugs as a way of managing utilization.
The report was commissioned by Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA).  Stark concludes that in order to reduce out-of-pocket costs for seniors, coverage should be provided for the "doughnut hole" gap in prescription drug coverage under Part D. 

January 26, 2010
FDA Approves Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution for Relief of Acute and Chronic Pain
ASCP learned today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution for the relief of moderate to severe, acute and chronic pain in opioid-tolerant patients. This medicine will be available in 100 milligrams per 5 mL or 20 milligrams per 1 mL. This is the only FDA-approved morphine sulfate oral solution available at this concentration. The manufacturer is Roxane Laboratories.  

Although the use of this medicine to manage pain has been common practice for many years, this form and concentration of morphine was not FDA approved until now. Today's action is part of the FDA's unapproved drugs initiative. As part of this program, the FDA has worked with the manufacturer of the now-approved product to ensure that there is enough supply of the drug available for patients. The FDA will also be working with organizations such as ASCP and prescribers so that they are aware that an approved product is available, and can notify the FDA if there are any problems with availability.

During a telephone call today with FDA's Douglas Throckmorton, M.D., Deputy Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), ASCP learned that:
  1. FDA has received assurances from Roxane that they have sufficient product to meet current market needs.  However, Roxane will be posting a toll free number to receive calls about product availability and FDA will be monitoring reports of any shortages.
  2. There was a REMS approved with the product consisting only of a medication guide (directed at patients and caregivers) with improved labeling and packaging to help reduce errors.
  3. The sponsor does not anticipate a "dramatic" price increase.
FDA is notifying CMS about the product approval to ensure coverage under Medicare part D.  ASCP will be monitoring this situation.  Please let us know if you experience shortages or other responses that may affect product availability.

For more FDA information on this issue:
1. March 31, 2009 Warning Letters, companies, and affected products
2. List of FDA-approved drug products

January 15, 2010
ASCP, Other Groups Urge Congress to Fix Pharmaceutical Waste Provisions for Long-Term Care
As Congressional leaders wrap up their negotiations on health care reform, ASCP, in conjunction with over a dozen other interests, sent letters to leaders within the House of Representatives urging them to support our previously proposed revisions to Section 1187 of the Affordable Health Care for America Act.  This provision requires the Secretary to mandate that pharmacies under contract to Medicare Part D plans utilize specified dispensing techniques in order to reduce pharmaceutical waste in long-term care.  Specifically, the letter used House leaders to: 1. Require the Secretary to collaborate and consult with relevant stakeholders to develop proposed standards and techniques that promote patient safety, minimize administrative burden and do not impose uncompensated costs on plans, pharmacies or facilities.  2. Ensure the workability of any proposed standards and techniques by requiring the Secretary to conduct pilot testing as appropriate.  3. Formalize the uniform adoption of the standards and techniques through rulemaking.   
December 24, 2009
Senate Passes Historic Health Care Reform Legislation

On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Senate voted 60-39 to pass historic health care reform legislation. Now the Senate and the House must work to reconcile the differences in the two separate bills. Some observers believe the process could be complete before the State of the Union speech. However, others believe that it will be difficult to bridge the differences between the two bills quickly. One major issue remains the fate of the House's "public plan" option. Alternative language in the Senate Bill gives the Office of Personal Management (OPM) authority toestablish and oversee a minimum of two, multi-state plans. Other issues that must be reconciled include:

1. The breadth and scope of the individual and employer mandates: Both Bills require all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay penalties. The House bill imposes a tax of 2.5 percent of adjusted gross income up to the average national premium for self or family plans offered in the exchange. The Senate penalty is a $750 tax per person (capped at $2,250 per household) or 2 percent of income,whichever is greater. The House bill requires that all employers provide coverage but the Senate Bill exempts employers with 50 or fewer employees.

2. Revenue Generators: The Senate bill places a tax on so-called "Cadillac" or high-cost insurance plans.The House Bill taxes high earners. The House legislation reduces payments to Medicare Advantage plans to 100 percent of fee for services realizing more than $160 billion in savings. The Senate version reduces payments by about $119 by creating a competitive bidding program.

3. State vs. Federally-operated Health Insurance Exchanges: Both Senate and House bills establish health insurance exchanges. However, in the House bill, the Federal government oversees the exchanges. In the Senate bill, health insurance exchanges are operated by individual states.

4. Subsidies: In the House bill, government subsidies are provided to people earning from 133 to 400 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL) and premiums are capped at 1.5% for the lowest income earners and 12% for high earners. The Senate bill provides subsidies for people earning 100 to 400 percent FPL, while premiums are capped at 2.8% and 9.8% depending on income.

5. Medicaid Expansion: Both bills expand Medicaid. In the House, Medicaid is expanded to 150 percent of FPL, while the Senate expands it to 133 percent.

6. Age rating: In the Senate bill, age rating is restricted to 3:1. In the House bill age rating is more restrictive at 2:1.

For a side by side comparison of the Senate and House versions of the Health Care Reform Legislation, go to: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm

December 22, 2009
Senate Healthcare Reform Legislation Moves Closer to Passage
Democrats continue to move sweeping health care reform legislation closer to passage, with successful passage of Senator Harry Reid's (D-NV) Manager's Amendment on December 19 followed by several procedural votes.  The final vote in the Senate is scheduled to take place on December 24. Once passed, the Senate bill will have to be reconciled with the House bill (H.R. 3962), which passed November 7. Democrats are hoping to produce a final bill that can be signed by President Obama in late January.

Senator Reid's Manager's Amendment contains a number of important changes including tightened restrictions on health insurance companies, some expanded delivery and payment reforms and new language to restrict the use of federal funds for elective abortions.  It also does away with the public option, replacing it with a provision that would authorize the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which currently administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, to contract with insurers to offer at least two nationwide plans, one of which must be nonprofit, through the new health insurance exchanges. OPM would be responsible for negotiating with insurers and ensuring the plans meet minimum standards, as it does for FEHBP. Senator Barbara Boxer's (D-CA) amendment to provide loan repayment assistance for pharmacists and other health care professionals who specialize in geriatrics was not included in the final bill.

Republicans continue to criticize the bill, particularly a number of state-specific provisions that were designed to secure support from several holdout Senators, including conservative Democratic Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska   Under the Manager's Amendment, the federal government will fully and permanently fund 100% of Nebraska's Medicaid expansion.  Vermont and Massachusetts, which were ineligible for any increase in federal Medicaid funding, will receive temporary increases. 
December 16, 2009
House Members Advocate for Higher Reimbursement to Community Pharmacies for Generic Drugs
Last week, a bipartisan group of sixteen House Members sent a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-8 CA) asking her to push for a higher Medicaid pharmacy reimbursement rate if the health care reform measure is sent to a conference committee, but they stopped short of asking for a specific figure.  Both the House and Senate health care reform bills include provisions that would increase the federal upper limits that Medicaid reimburses community pharmacies for generic drugs – the House version is 130 percent of the weighted average of the average manufacturer price (AMP) and the Senate is 175 percent.   Signers of the letter include Reps. Anthony D. Weiner (D-9 NY), Joe Barton (R-6 TX), Michael A. Arcuri (D-24 NY), Marion Berry (D-1 AR), Sanford D. Bishop Jr. (D-2 GA), Leonard L. Boswell (D-3 IA), Rick Boucher (D-9 VA), Christopher P. Carney (D-10 PA), Joe Courtney (D-2 CT), Lloyd Doggett (D-25 TX), Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-AL SD), Walter B. Jones (R-3 NC), Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-5 WA), Jerry Moran (R-1 KS), Timothy J. Walz (D-1 MN), and Peter Welch (D-AL VT). 
December 14, 2009
ASCP Sends Boxer Amendment Sign-on to Senate
Last week, ASCP circulated a sign-on letter to other pharmacy associations and members in support of Senator Boxer's Amendment to establish a loan repayment program for health care professionals (including pharmacists) who specialize in geriatrics.  Nine organizations and over 250 individuals signed onto the letter that was sent to all 100 Senators.  If you support Senator Boxer's Amendment, please consider calling your Senator today and ask them to co-sponsor Amendment No. 2944--Geriatric Health Care Workforce.  It's easy, simply dial the US Capitol Switchboard and ask to be connected to your Senators' offices.  The number is 202-224-3121.
December 11, 2009
DEA Responds to Sen. Kohl and Sen. Whitehouse's Letter--and QCCPP Writes Back!
The DEA has responded to Senator Kohl and Senator Whitehouse's letter, which had raised concerns about the inability of nursing home and hospice patients to receive timely, adequate access to pain medication and other controlled drugs.  DEA did not address the Senators' concerns; instead, DEA's response states that it has discovered that some pharmacies affiliated with long-term care facilities are violating the Controlled Substances Act and its implementing regulations.  Among practices cited are reliance on chart orders and hospital discharge summaries.

The Quality Care Coalition for Patients in Pain wasted no time in responding to the Drug Enforcement Administration's letter to Senators Kohl and Whitehouse.  In its letter toAttorney General Eric Holder, dated December 10, 2009, QCCPP points out the differences between what DEA allows in hospitals and in nursing homes, and the resulting impact on patients.  The letter explains how strict compliance with DEA rules and policies adds additional steps that can significantly delay treatment.  The letter goes on to state:

"While we respect and support DEA's mission to ensure that controlled drugs are not being diverted and are only used for legitimate medical purposes, the needless suffering that patients are now enduring demands that a balance be achieved that addresses these legitimate law enforcement concerns without causing harm to patients." 
December 10, 2009
Senator Dorgan Lashes Out at FDA Commissioner Over Drug Reimportation Amendment
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg has sent a letter to Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) commenting on his legislation to allow imports of pharmaceuticals. Hamburg said the legislation as currently written would be logistically challenging to implement and "resource intensive."  She also cited "significant safety concerns related to allowing the importation of non-bioequivalent products," as well as issues related to confusion in distribution and labeling "that remain to be fully addressed in the amendment." Senator Dorgan responded by calling Commissioner Hamburg's concerns "completely bogus." 
December 8, 2009
ASCP Opposes CMS's Proposed Changes to Part D Formulary Policies Designed to Protect Beneficiaries' Access to Medically Necessary Medications
ASCP has filed comments in response to CMS' proposed policy and technical changes to Medicare Part D.  Although ASCP supports a number of proposed changes, ASCP expressed strong opposition to changes that would weaken the criteria used to define protected drug classes and limit the ability of long-term care residents to secure access to non-formulary drugs during care transitions. 
Federal Issues
Use these resources to learn more about how current federal issues may directly impact consultant and senior care pharmacy.
more >>

State Issues
Here you will find the latest state legislation and regulations that directly affect consultant and senior care pharmacy.                    
more >>

Briefing Rooms
Your complete source for information and resources on various issues, including Patient Safety, Repackaging of Medications, HIPAA, etc. 
more >>


Medicare Drug Benefit
Resources and links to assist pharmacists and other stakeholders with the Medicare Part D drug benefit program. 
more >>

CMS Resources
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) regulations, guidance documents, links and announcements. 
more >>


ASCP Advocacy Center
Take Action! Learn how to communicate your views to decision-makers directly and make a difference for the profession. 
more >>


ASCP-PAC
Promote the legislative goals and express the concerns of consultant and senior care pharmacy to members of Congress. (Members Only)    
more >>

Coalitions

Listing of various groups and coalitions of which ASCP is a member.
more >>


Support the ASCP Advocacy/Campaign 2011 Fund
ASCP’s legislative war chest, will increase the ASCP Policy and Advocacy Department’s ability to advance advocacy efforts at the state and federal levels.  
more >>




Print PagePrint Page  Email PageEmail Page 
Copyright & DisclaimerPrivacy StatementGuidelines
#Email Address